• en
  • de


  • The bossy Apps


    Konrad Wakolbinger

    What remains of the great promise of the gig economy: freedom through autonomy.

    “With the focus on sporti­ness and indi­vi­du­al per­for­mance and with team spirit and cycling culture…”, Foodora adver­ti­sed for students as new bike deli­ve­rers. We, the users of platform-based food delivery services, hardly know anything about the working reality of the  deli­ve­rers  called ‘riders’.  A research group of socio­lo­gists and lawyers has taken a closer look at the situation of the riders of Foodora (now Mjam) and Deliveroo (now dis­con­ti­nued) in Berlin. The study focuses on the area of conflict between autonomy vs. control of the bike deli­ve­rers and asks in its title: “The App as a Boss?”. Looking at the results of the study, there are good reasons to affirm this question.

    Contrary to what one might think, the riders do have some freedom of choice. They are free to choose the delivery route, there is no time limit for the com­ple­ti­on of the job and if they work as free­lan­cers, they have the right to refuse jobs. But through the func­tio­n­a­li­ty of the Apps, the platforms have various tools that condition the riders to behave in a way that is cumu­la­tively bene­fi­cial to the company. For this purpose, nudging tools are combined with gami­fi­ca­ti­on elements. The pre­re­qui­si­te is total infor­ma­ti­on asymmetry. The apps collect data from and about the deli­ve­rers and thus optimize the control features. On the other hand, the workers on the bikes are largely isolated from each other and the way the apps work function as their black box. Rational decision-making autonomy is not possible for them. Because, if at all, they are only mar­gi­nal­ly informed about which input variables lead to which result and how the variables are weighted. It is signi­fi­cant to note, for example, that the deli­ve­rers of Deliveroo must decide on an order without being aware of the customer’s address.

    The strongest control feature of the platforms is undoub­ted­ly the influence on earnings. Firstly, through a bonus system and secondly through the per­for­mance-based incentive of choosing the shift for the next month. The system, which rewards good behaviour, generates a ranking: The “High-Per­for­mers” are allowed to vote first and sign up for the best slots, for the “Moderate-Per­for­mers” the dregs remain. Pas­sio­na­te cyclists among the deli­ve­rers compete against each other using ‘Strava’ (a sports app) and thus strive for top per­for­man­ces. The platforms thus generate a “col­la­te­ral” benefit.

    The findings of “The App as a Boss?” suggest that the bicycle workers feel more auto­no­mous than they actually are. Autonomy as the central promise of the gig economy is a double-edged sword.

     

    Refe­ren­ces:
    Foodora and Deliveroo: The App as a Boss?
    Control and Autonomy in App-Based Manage­ment — The Case of Food Delivery Riders
    Mirela Ivanova, Joanna Bro­no­wi­cka, Eva Kocher and Anne Degner

    What it's like to be a food delivery rider The Straits Times Singapore, John Lui 

    I Worked a Job At Deliveroo for a Week & Made £___ by Ben Morris 

    Tags

    The bossy Apps

    Konrad Wakolbinger

    What remains of the great promise of the gig economy: freedom through autonomy.

    “With the focus on sporti­ness and indi­vi­du­al per­for­mance and with team spirit and cycling culture…”, Foodora adver­ti­sed for students as new bike deli­ve­rers. We, the users of platform-based food delivery services, hardly know anything about the working reality of the  deli­ve­rers  called ‘riders’.  A research group of socio­lo­gists and lawyers has taken a closer look at the situation of the riders of Foodora (now Mjam) and Deliveroo (now dis­con­ti­nued) in Berlin. The study focuses on the area of conflict between autonomy vs. control of the bike deli­ve­rers and asks in its title: “The App as a Boss?”. Looking at the results of the study, there are good reasons to affirm this question.

    Contrary to what one might think, the riders do have some freedom of choice. They are free to choose the delivery route, there is no time limit for the com­ple­ti­on of the job and if they work as free­lan­cers, they have the right to refuse jobs. But through the func­tio­n­a­li­ty of the Apps, the platforms have various tools that condition the riders to behave in a way that is cumu­la­tively bene­fi­cial to the company. For this purpose, nudging tools are combined with gami­fi­ca­ti­on elements. The pre­re­qui­si­te is total infor­ma­ti­on asymmetry. The apps collect data from and about the deli­ve­rers and thus optimize the control features. On the other hand, the workers on the bikes are largely isolated from each other and the way the apps work function as their black box. Rational decision-making autonomy is not possible for them. Because, if at all, they are only mar­gi­nal­ly informed about which input variables lead to which result and how the variables are weighted. It is signi­fi­cant to note, for example, that the deli­ve­rers of Deliveroo must decide on an order without being aware of the customer’s address.

    The strongest control feature of the platforms is undoub­ted­ly the influence on earnings. Firstly, through a bonus system and secondly through the per­for­mance-based incentive of choosing the shift for the next month. The system, which rewards good behaviour, generates a ranking: The “High-Per­for­mers” are allowed to vote first and sign up for the best slots, for the “Moderate-Per­for­mers” the dregs remain. Pas­sio­na­te cyclists among the deli­ve­rers compete against each other using ‘Strava’ (a sports app) and thus strive for top per­for­man­ces. The platforms thus generate a “col­la­te­ral” benefit.

    The findings of “The App as a Boss?” suggest that the bicycle workers feel more auto­no­mous than they actually are. Autonomy as the central promise of the gig economy is a double-edged sword.

     

    Refe­ren­ces:
    Foodora and Deliveroo: The App as a Boss?
    Control and Autonomy in App-Based Manage­ment — The Case of Food Delivery Riders
    Mirela Ivanova, Joanna Bro­no­wi­cka, Eva Kocher and Anne Degner

    What it's like to be a food delivery rider The Straits Times Singapore, John Lui

    I Worked a Job At Deliveroo for a Week & Made £___ by Ben Morris

    Tags


    Society without connection

    Society without connection

    The new film "Please hold the line" (2020) by Pavel Cuzuioc loosely follows the work of service technicians in the telecommunications industry in the far east of Europe while actually portraying their customers more. Those who are in danger of losing their connection to society.

    Forklift-Conflicts

    Forklift-Conflicts

    In the Aisles (2018) by Thomas Stuber is the ultimate warehouse-worker feature film. There has never been so much 'workplace' featured in a movie, set in a wholesale market, with so much insight into learning the ropes of an unskilled job. On top of that, romance.

    Korea's Generation Internship 4.0

    Korea’s Genera­ti­on Internship 4.0

    The TV series "Misaeng: Incomplete Life" gives deep insights into South-Korea's working world and the difficult transition to get there.

    Still, Lazzaro is happy

    Still, Lazzaro is happy

    Alice Rohrwacher's film about the dubious liberation from a relationship of subjection

    Gundermann: Swan song on a work paradigm

    Gun­der­mann: Swan song on a work paradigm

    The biopic 'Gundermann' (2018) reveals en passant the decline of open-cast mining in Lusatia and the fleeting work paradigm of the German Democratic Republic.

    Wittgenstein stop motion

    Witt­gen­stein stop motion

    Ana Vasof's cinematic anecdotes inspire praxeology and incisively question our ways of thinking and acting.

    1 39 40 41 42 43 48